Blog | Daiwa Lance International

Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance: Key Differences

Written by Author Name | 2026.02.11

Plasma Cutting and Thermic Lance are two powerful yet fundamentally different industrial cutting technologies, each suited for specific materials, environments, and performance needs. Understanding their differences helps manufacturers, maintenance teams, and demolition professionals improve efficiency, safety, and cost control.

This article provides a side-by-side comparison of Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance, covering working principles, material compatibility, cutting capacity, equipment requirements, noise levels, and cost—so you can quickly determine which solution fits your project best.

Operating Principle: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Plasma Cutting

Plasma cutting uses an electrical current combined with compressed gas to generate an extremely hot plasma arc—reaching temperatures of up to 30,000°C. The ionized gas melts the metal while high-pressure airflow ejects molten material from the kerf, producing a clean and precise cut.

Thermic Lance

Thermic Lance operates through an exothermic oxidation reaction. A steel pipe packed with steel wires is ignited while oxygen is supplied through the lance, creating an intense chemical burn. The reaction 4Fe + 3O₂ → 2Fe₂O₃ + Heat generates temperatures of approximately 3,000–4,000°C, enabling it to melt and penetrate extremely dense materials.

Material Compatibility: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

This is the biggest difference between the two methods:

Plasma Cutting

  • Suitable only for electrically conductive metals such as carbon steel, stainless steel, aluminum, copper, and brass.
  • Not effective on non-conductive materials like wood, ceramics, plastics, glass, or concrete.

Thermic Lance

  • Capable of cutting virtually all materials, including both metals and non-metals.
  • Effective on stainless steel, cast iron, non-ferrous metals, reinforced concrete, refractory bricks, natural stone, and composite materials.

Thickness and Cutting Capability: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Plasma Cutting

  • Best for thin to medium thickness materials.
  • Advanced industrial systems can cut carbon steel up to 160 mm, while portable units typically handle 25–38 mm.
  • Known for high precision, narrow kerf width, and fast cutting speed—often 5–6 times faster than oxy-fuel on thin metals.

Thermic Lance

  • Designed for extreme thickness and heavy mass removal where other methods fail.
  • Can penetrate metal blocks over 2 meters thick.
  • Commonly used for furnace skull removal, large shaft cutting, and reinforced concrete demolition.

Equipment and Mobility: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Plasma Cutting

  • Equipment Required: Power supply, plasma cutter unit, compressed air system or gas cylinders.
  • Mobility: Moderate. Portability depends on access to electricity and air supply; industrial setups can be bulky.

Thermic Lance

  • Equipment Required: Lance pipe, holder, oxygen cylinder, and hose assembly. No electrical power is required.
  • Mobility: Very high. Lightweight and deployable in remote or confined environments.

Working Environment (Noise & Vibration): Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Plasma Cutting

  • Produces significant noise, bright arc light, and metallic fumes during operation.
  • Requires proper ventilation and protective equipment.

Thermic Lance

  • Operates with minimal vibration and comparatively low noise.
  • Suitable for environments sensitive to vibration or structural impact, such as near hospitals or critical infrastructure zones.

Cost: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Plasma Cutting

    • High initial investment for machinery.
    • Lower long-term operating cost for regular sheet-metal cutting, mainly electricity and consumables (nozzles, gas).

Thermic Lance

    • Low initial equipment cost.
    • Higher consumable cost because each lance rod burns away.

Summary Comparison Table: Plasma Cutting vs. Thermic Lance

Feature

Plasma Cutting

Thermic Lance

Temperature

Up to 30,000°C (arc)

3,000°C – 4,000°C

Materials

Conductive metals only (steel, stainless, etc.)

Almost all materials (metal, concrete, stone, etc.)

Max Thickness

~160 mm (industrial machines)

Up to 2 meters or more

Precision

High, smooth cut

Lower, mainly for rough cutting/demolition

Noise/Vibration

Loud noise, fumes

Low vibration, less structural noise

Energy Source

Electricity + compressed gas

Oxygen + chemical reaction

Main Applications

Precision fabrication, manufacturing

Heavy demolition, rescue, furnace skull removal

Conclusion

Choosing between Plasma Cutting and Thermic Lance depends largely on your project’s priorities.

  • Select Plasma Cutting when you need speed, precision, and clean edges for sheet metal fabrication or workshop production.
  • Opt for Thermic Lance when dealing with ultra-thick materials, mixed substrates, or heavy demolition tasks where portability and raw cutting power outweigh surface finish.

Both technologies play critical roles in modern industry, but understanding their strengths ensures you invest in the right tool for maximum productivity and safety.

Daiwa Lance is a specialized manufacturer of high-performance oxygen lances, certified to ISO and JIS standards. Established in 1996 in Vietnam, Daiwa Lance has supplied oxygen lances to more than 55 countries worldwide, serving steel plants, foundries, and high-temperature industrial applications.

If you are looking for a reliable oxygen lance manufacturer with proven performance in EAF steelmaking and molten metal environments, contact us today for technical consultation and product selection support.